Applying Pretopological Concepts & Negotiation Analysis to Study Cockpit’s Perspective to Collaborative Decision Making
نویسنده
چکیده
Objective: This research is designed to present a methodological approach for problems encountered with cockpits perspective to collaborate decision making in order to support the Air Transport Management (ATM) with simulation software development and system behaviour simulation. Background: Collaborative decision making (CDM) is a means to challenge punctuality and reliability issues at congested airports in order to raise operational capacity at the airport and air space structure, not by sophisticated optimization algorithms rather than just information sharing and common situational awareness. Initial concepts of CDM emphasize the importance of global collaboration among interactions between airport operators, air traffic control (ATC), airlines, ground handling service providers and the central flow management unit (CFMU). From cockpits perspective, CDM should be considered as a means to allow participation of flight crews in air-traffic decision making that affects them. This applies to all decisions ranging from operational to safety issues during all phases of flight/ ground operation. From cockpits perspective, two main issues should be addressed: • How can information sharing/ common situational awareness between flight crews and ground parties be accomplished in order to achieve a high level of punctuality and predictability during flight/ground operation. • Is it possible to improve operation by cooperation of all parties. Method: This approach is based upon mathematical tools like pretopological and decision making concepts. Negotiation Analysis approaches decision making in order to identify prescriptive, normative and descriptive decision concepts. Distinctions are made among the prototypical and unitary perspective of an individual decision maker (pilot), and the dynamics between multiple decision entities (airline operator, ATC). In complex systems decision entities can also have a different structure. Pretopological concepts are used to identify groups of interdependent elements (for example pilot-controller relation) and elements which are related with each other within the Air Transport System (for example pilot-pilot relation).
منابع مشابه
Assessment of Prospective Memory, Risky Decision-Making, Collaborative Decision-Making among Individuals with Morning and Evening Circadian Typology
Introduction: Biological aspects of personality have an influence on people psychological dimensions. The present study was aimed to compare prospective memory, risky decision-making, collaborative decision-making between individuals with morning and evening circadian typology. Methods: For this purpose, a study with quantitative methodology approach and a descriptive design was conceived. T...
متن کاملCCollaborative Framework for Decision Making Process of the Water Management (Case Study: Kashafrood Basin)
Sophisticated social- ecology systems, such as those in water management in a basin, are usually dynamic, multidimensional, or multidimensional, requiring serious engagement by multiple actors, and decision making in such systems is always faced with serious problems Kashafrood basin in Khorasan Razavi province is one of the most critical aquifers in the country due to the high population growt...
متن کامل“Wood Already Touched by Fire is not Hard to Set Alight”; Comment on “Constraints to Applying Systems Thinking Concepts in Health Systems: A Regional Perspective from Surveying Stakeholders in Eastern Mediterranean Countries”
A major constraint to the application of any form of knowledge and principles is the awareness, understanding and acceptance of the knowledge and principles. Systems Thinking (ST) is a way of understanding and thinking about the nature of health systems and how to make and implement decisions within health systems to maximize desired and minimize undesired effects. A major constraint to applyi...
متن کاملAgent Based Negotiation for Collaborative Design Decision Making
Complex design involves trade-offs and teamwork. To make collaborative design decisions, designers must negotiate with each other to resolve their discrepancies through exploring the design space, generating new ideas and compromising for agreement. Advances in negotiation research have been made in social psychology, distributed artificial intelligence, and decision theory. But few have been a...
متن کاملA Risk-based Global Coordination System in a Distributed Product Development Environment for Collaborative Design, Part I, Framework
This is the first of a two-part paper introducing a risk-based global coordination system in a distributed environment for collaborative design. Part I presents the basic concepts and a theoretical framework, and Part II describes the implementation and practical application to a National Science Foundation supported collaborative network. In a distributed environment, local negotiations within...
متن کامل